timelets: (Default)
“IV. (9) 

The understanding 
                   forms positive ideas 
              before 
                  forming negative ideas.

V. (108:10) 

It perceives things not so much under the condition
   of duration as under a certain form of eternity, and in an
   infinite number; or rather in perceiving things it does not
   consider either their number or duration, whereas, in imagining
   them, it perceives them in a determinate number, duration, and quantity.”


--- Benedictus de Spinoza. “Improvement of the Understanding.”
timelets: (Default)
[92] (1) As for the first point, it is necessary (as we have said) for our purpose that everything should be conceived, either solely through its essence, or through its proximate cause.

(2) If the thing be self-existent, or, as is commonly said, the cause of itself, it must be understood through its essence only; if it be not self-existent, but requires a cause for its existence, it must be understood through its proximate cause.
(3) For, in reality, 
                   the knowledge
                   of an effect 
is nothing else than 
                  the acquisition of 
                  more perfect knowledge
of its cause.”

--- Benedictus de Spinoza. “Improvement of the Understanding.”


// is this the origin of the reasoning behind the "good laws" methods?
timelets: (Default)
[30:2]
...we must first take care  not to commit ourselves to a search, going back to infinity - that is, 

in order to discover 
                     the best method 
of finding truth, there is
               no need of another method 
               to discover such method; 
nor of a third method 
for discovering the second, 
                and so on to infinity. 

(3) By such proceedings, we should never arrive at the knowledge of the truth, or, indeed, at any knowledge at all.

[31] (1) But as men at first made use of the instruments supplied by nature to accomplish very easy pieces of workmanship, laboriously and imperfectly, and then, when these were finished, wrought other things more difficult with less labour and greater perfection; and so gradually mounted from the simplest operations to the making of tools, and from the making of tools to the making of more complex tools, and fresh feats of workmanship, till they arrived at making, complicated mechanisms which they now possess.



--- Benedictus de Spinoza. “Improvement of the Understanding.”
timelets: (Default)
...we must 
         bear in mind that 
                the terms 
good and evil are 
          only applied relatively, 

so that 

the same thing may be called both 
                      good and bad according 
to the relations 
in view, 
    in the same 
way 
     as it may be called perfect or 
                        imperfect. 

(3) Nothing 
        regarded in its own nature can 
                         be called perfect or 
imperfect; especially 
                 when we are aware 
that 

all things which come to pass,
                 come to pass 
according to the eternal 
                            order 
and fixed laws of nature.”


--- Benedictus de Spinoza. “Improvement of the Understanding.”
timelets: (Default)


-- Spinoza, Treatize, ch 16.
timelets: (Default)


Gilles Deleuze. Spinoza, Practical Philosophy, 2001.
timelets: (Default)
PROP. XV.

He who clearly and distinctly
understands himself
and his emotions

loves God,

and so much the more
in proportion
as he more
understands himself
and his emotions.

Proof.—

He who clearly and distinctly understands
himself
and his emotions
feels pleasure (III. liii.),

and this pleasure is
(by the last Prop.)
accompanied by
the idea of God;

therefore (Def. of the Emotions, vi.)
such a one
loves God,

and (for the same reason)
so much the more
in proportion as he more understands himself
and his emotions.

Q.E.D.

--- Spinoza, The Ethics, Part V, Prop XV


http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap05
timelets: (Default)
PROP. III. An emotion, which is a passion, ceases to be a passion, as soon as we form a clear and distinct idea thereof.

Proof.—
An emotion, 
          which is a passion, 
                      is a confused idea 

(by the general Def. of the Emotions). 

If, therefore, 
             we form a clear 
                     and distinct idea 
                             of a given emotion, 
that idea 
         will only be distinguished 
                                from the emotion, 
in so far as 
          it is referred 
                       to the mind only, 
                                       by reason 
(II. xxi., and note); 

therefore (III. iii.), 
                   the emotion will cease to be 
                                           a passion. Q.E.D.

Corollary—

An emotion therefore becomes 
more under our control, 
and the mind 
is less passive 
in respect to it, 
in proportion 
as it is more 
known to us.


--- Spinoza, The Ethics, Part V, Prop III.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap05
timelets: (Default)
PROP. XLVII. Emotions of hope and fear cannot be in themselves good.

Proof.—Emotions of hope and fear cannot exist without pain. For fear is pain (Def. of the Emotions, xiii.), and hope (Def. of the Emotions, Explanation xii. and xiii.) cannot exist without fear; therefore (IV. xli.) these emotions cannot be good in themselves, but only in so far as they can restrain excessive pleasure (IV. xliii.). Q.E.D.

Note.—We may add, that these emotions show defective knowledge and an absence of power in the mind; for the same reason confidence, despair, joy, and disappointment are signs of a want of mental power.

Spinoza, Ethics, Part IV, Prop XLVII.
timelets: (Default)
PROP. XXXIII. There is nothing positive in ideas, which causes them to be called false.

Proof.—If this be denied, conceive, if possible, a positive mode of thinking, which should constitute the distinctive quality of falsehood. Such a mode of thinking cannot be in God (II. xxxii.); external to God it cannot be or be conceived (I. xv.). Therefore there is nothing positive in ideas which causes them to be called false. Q.E.D.

-- Spinoza, Ethics. Part II.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap02
timelets: (Default)
Read more... )

We may easily proceed
               thus to infinity, 
                                  and conceive 
             
the whole of nature 
                     as one individual,

whose parts,
that is, 
            all bodies, 
                        vary in infinite ways, 
without any change 
                     in the individual 
                                      as a whole. 



-- Spinoza, The Ethics, Part II, Lemma VII, Note.
http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap02
timelets: (Default)
PROP. XIV

A true knowledge 
             of good and evil 
                        cannot check any emotion 
by virtue 
            of being true, 
but 
      only in so far as 
                   it is considered as an emotion.

---Proof.

An emotion is an idea, 
                       whereby 
the mind affirms 
                  of its body 
a greater or less 
                  force of existing 
than before (by the general Definition of the Emotions); 

therefore 
             it has no positive quality, 
which 
     can be destroyed
                    by the presence 
of what is true;


consequently the knowledge of good and evil cannot, by virtue of being true,
restrain any emotion. But, in so far as such knowledge is an emotion (IV. viii.)
if it to have more strength for restraining emotion, it will to that extent be able
to restrain the given emotion. Q.E.D.


--- Spinoza, Ethics. Part IV, Prop. XIV.
timelets: (Default)
Hence it follows, 
             that the human mind 
is part of the infinite 
             intellect of God; 

thus when we say, that 
           the human mind perceives this or that, 
                     we make the assertion, that 
God has this or that idea, 

not in so far as he is infinite, 
                           but 
in so far as he is 
              displayed through the nature of the human mind, 
or in so far as 

he constitutes the essence 
                 of the human mind; 

and when we say that 
             God has this or that idea, 
not only in so far as 
           he constitutes the essence of the human mind, 

but also in so far as 
           he, simultaneously with the human mind, 
                       has the further idea of another thing, 

we assert that 
the human mind perceives a thing 
           in part or inadequately.


--- Spinoza, The Ethics. Part II, Prop XI, Corollary. 

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap02
timelets: (Default)
A thing is called necessary either in respect to its essence or in respect to its cause; for the existence of a thing necessarily follows, either from its essence and definition, or from a given efficient cause. For similar reasons a thing is said to be impossible; namely, inasmuch as its essence or definition involves a contradiction, or because no external cause is granted, which is conditioned to produce such an effect; but a thing can in no respect be called contingent, save in relation to the imperfection of our knowledge.

A thing of which we do not know whether the essence does or does not involve a contradiction, or of which, knowing that it does not involve a contradiction, we are still in doubt concerning the existence, because the order of causes escapes us,—such a thing, I say, cannot appear to us either necessary or impossible. Wherefore we call it contingent or possible.

-- Benedict de Spinoza. Ethics, Part I, PROP. XXXIII.

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/3800/3800-h/3800-h.htm#chap01


A x B -> ∅
timelets: (Default)
For, by substance, would be understood
that which is in itself,
and is conceived
through itself —

that is,
something of which
the conception requires not the conception of anything else;

whereas
modifications exist
in something external to themselves,

and a conception of them
is formed by means
of a conception of the thing
in which they exist.

Therefore,
we may have true ideas
of non—existent modifications;

for, although they may have no actual existence
apart from the conceiving intellect,

yet their essence
is so involved
in something external to themselves
that they may through it be conceived.

Whereas
the only truth substances can have,
external to the intellect,
must consist in their existence,

because
they are conceived
through themselves.

--- Benedictus de Spinoza. “Ethics.” Prop. VIII, Note II.

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 04:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios