timelets: (Default)
“Cognitive powers are necessarily limited. They do not simply overwhelm the world around them. Rather, intelligence consists in finding ways to operate immanently, within the world, and in concert with other entities in the world.
Intelligence works by enlisting and forming alliances with other intelligences – as Bruno Latour might put it.”

Steven Shaviro. “Discognition.”


Why cognitive powers are limited? What are the fundamental constraints?
timelets: (Default)
2.2.5 We may be understood, that is

surrounded,
diverted,
betrayed,
displaced,
transmitted,

but we are never understood well.

If a message is transported, then it is transformed.
We never get a message that is simply spread.

--- Bruno Latour. TPoF, 1993.


It follows that something going viral on a social network is an indication of the desire to not understand. The viral content must be a no-brainer that requires zero transformation effort on the part of the receiver, a person who's spending their mental effort elsewhere. "В одно ухо влетело, в другое вылетело" (Easy come, easy go). Recalling Searle's The Chinese Room Argument, we can start thinking about surface level understanding as an enhanced perception that can be relatively easy to subject to ML, which TikTok uses most successfully to parasitize on mental laziness.
timelets: (Default)
2.1.10 Since nothing is inherent in anything else, the dialectic is a fairy tale. Contradictions are negotiated like the rest. They are built, not given.

--- Bruno Latour. The Pasteurization of France, 1993.


Exposing contradictions is one of the main purposes of a good fairy tale.
timelets: (Default)
...the simplicity of the perceptual judgment on which the setting up of the proof culminated is what made the difference and carried conviction. Pasteur was not stinting in the laboratory and outside in concentrating interest and discussion on a few extremely simple perceptual contrasts: ab­ sence/presence; before/after; living/dead; pure/impure.
...
even if the Pasteurians developed a biology in the laboratory, they did not practice a labo­ratory biology. They did not leave to others, as apparently happened in England, the job of using or applying their results, contenting themselves with "pure science."

--- BL, TPoF, 1993.


cf. AlphaGo.
Read more... )
timelets: (Default)
This is probably the best illustration of the concept of technoscience I've seen to-date.




--- Latour, TPoF, p. 267.
timelets: (Default)
In retrospect [and additional insight from TPoF] it's more clear what the COVID vaccine community had not done to convince the public about the benefits of vaccination.

In line with the expectations and demands of the period, the prize would go to whoever explained not contagion but variation in con­tagiousness in terms of environmental circumstances.
...
...since their problem was to reconcile contagions and morbid spontaneity. As soon as Pasteur, using anthrax, reproduced in the laboratory the influence of the environment on the virulence of a microbe, all the power of the hygienist movement shifted and became belief in the laboratory of the Rue d'Ulm.

--- Bruno Latour. The Pasteurization of France, 1993.

Up till now we don't know what causes the variation in COVID-19 outcomes. Of course, there are hints developed through limited studies, but no clear causal link has been established yet. We should've had volunteer human trials, after all.
timelets: (Default)

The exact sciences elude social analysis not because they are distant or separated from society, but because they revolutionize the very conception of society and of what it comprises. Pasteurism is an admirable example.

--- Bruno Latour. The Pasteurization of France, 1993. p 38.


AI seems to be moving in the same direction.

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 11:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios