From shaming to intellectual challenge

[timelets]

I see a beginning of a pragmatic shift within a more farsighted academia: away from shaming alt-right ideologues to challenging them intellectually. Shaming works only as long as the society is unified in its cultural norms. Once the norms fracture, one has to find a deeper cultural background for discussing ideas. For example, the tag "alt-right" itself is a misnomer akin to "horseless carriage." That is, it denotes what the thing is not, rather than what it actually stands for. This is a sign of an early-stage innovation where the future is highly uncertain and open to interpretation. No wonder it attracts amoral opportunists like Trump and Co.

Comments

[timelets]

From this perspective, would a blueprint of a car be considered a positive or a normative statement?

[lxe]

It's a positive description [of something that's suitable for a particular purpose according to the designer's knowledge and belief].
A contract obligation or an administrative ordinance to use it for a particular purpose would be a normative statement.