From shaming to intellectual challenge

[timelets]

I see a beginning of a pragmatic shift within a more farsighted academia: away from shaming alt-right ideologues to challenging them intellectually. Shaming works only as long as the society is unified in its cultural norms. Once the norms fracture, one has to find a deeper cultural background for discussing ideas. For example, the tag "alt-right" itself is a misnomer akin to "horseless carriage." That is, it denotes what the thing is not, rather than what it actually stands for. This is a sign of an early-stage innovation where the future is highly uncertain and open to interpretation. No wonder it attracts amoral opportunists like Trump and Co.

Comments

[tijd]

away from shaming alt-right ideologues to challenging them intellectually

It does not work (and not because they are intellectullly superior).

Positive alternative narratives have been ruthlessly mocked and assaulted by the extreme-right, and have the efect of reinforcing their narratives.
http://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/The-Fringe-Insurgency-221017.pdf

[timelets]

The goal is not to convince the alt-righters. Rather, it's to figure out how and why it works.