(no subject)

WSJ review shows that ICE agents intentionally create situations that result in shooting of unarmed civilians in vehicles. They also violate rules of safe engagement taught to police officers.

The Journal identified 13 shootings involving ICE or CBP agents and civilian vehicles since July, using court records, news reports and gun-violence databases.

Footage verified by the Journal and a video shared on Friday by DHS show Ross moving in front of the vehicle while its engine was running, which former and current DHS agents say they are trained not to do.

The Minneapolis shooting shares characteristics with others the Journal reviewed: Agents box in a vehicle, try to remove an individual, block attempts to flee, then fire.

Footage from the shootings also shows officers approaching civilian vehicles with their engines still running—a situation police are trained to avoid. According to Kerlikowske, such training is designed to keep officers out of harm’s way.

Videos reviewed by the Journal show officers trying to open vehicle doors, reaching into vehicles and smashing windows, followed by drivers fleeing.

Police are trained to break a window only in specific circumstances, such as if the driver is armed or there is a medical emergency, said Alpert. In footage from the four cases closely reviewed by the Journal, none of the drivers had firearms, but DHS insists they were still dangerous.

Obstructing a moving vehicle
In at least three of the shootings, officers pursued a vehicle on foot. Footage also shows officers moving into the potential path of the vehicle or clinging on to it while it moved.

“It’s like policing 101. Don’t get in front of a car or in their potential pathway, especially if the engine is running,” said Jon Blum, a former North Carolina officer who now develops police training curricula.

Firing into a moving vehicle also creates its own danger, according to Alpert.

“If I shoot you, and I’m successful, now we’ve got an unguided missile,” said Alpert. “What if there are kids playing in the street?”

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/videos-show-how-ice-vehicle-stops-can-escalate-to-shootings-caf17601

(no subject)

Finally, the notion that AI is not about "intelligence" is starting to percolate into the mainstream. Almost 10 years ago I argued that point but at the time it fell on deaf ears. Today, technology people still have this weird fascination with the idea that they could build "better" human minds or "improved" biological organisms, using novel hardware and software. It's a part of a greater psychological bias that prevents us from seeing the new, but with AI this mindset is particularly limiting.

...influential group of social and cognitive scientists say can help us better understand artificial intelligence. Today’s AI models are not, in their view, akin to a human mind. Rather, they’re a form of “cultural or social” technology that aggregates and passes on human knowledge — more like a printing press or even a bureaucracy or a market. If we want to understand how to manage AI, they say, we should study how we’ve handled new social technologies in the past.

Last year, Science published a version of this argument by Henry Farrell (a political scientist), Alison Gopnik (a psychologist), Cosma Shalizi (a statistician) and James Evans (a sociologist). “Beginning with language itself, human beings have had distinctive capacities to learn from the experiences of other humans and these capacities are arguably the secret of human evolutionary success,” the authors write. They go on to identify key ideas — from print to television to representative democracy — that transformed the nature of social learning by changing how societies process information.

The Science authors think we should view large language models along these lines — not as intelligence, but as a new form of cultural communication.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-09/what-s-the-best-way-to-think-of-ai-look-to-democracy-marketplaces

(no subject)

“The school was in a sad state. Red Guards had trashed much of its equipment, which symbolized old ideas and old customs. Most of the desks and chairs had gone missing. Teachers had tried to hide cartloads of the school’s books, but these had been found and burned. Around half the teachers, some thirty instructors, had been denounced and persecuted. Two math teachers had been killed, and a history teacher had died of illness during forced labor.”

--- Eva Dou. “House of Huawei.”

That was back in 1979, right after Mao's death which resulted in the rise of Deng Xiaoping and the end of the Cultural Revolution.

upd:

“Deng held the nation’s first National Science Conference in March 1978...
In a rousing speech, Deng told the scientists that they were not part of the bourgeoisie, as they had been previously labeled, but part of the working class. “Everyone who works, whether with his hands or with his brain, is part of the working people in a socialist society,” Deng declared".

ibid.