(no subject)

[timelets]

Speaking of Singapore, if one wants to be more or less safe during the coronavirus event, moving to Singapore would be one of the best options.

Also, I wonder whether states of California and Washington could use health emergency laws to deal with the homelessness problem. Obviously, you don't want to have people living in anti-sanitary conditions while there's an imminent threat of a major viral pandemic in a densely populated urban area.

Comments

[lm644]

Don’t know about the rest of the East Cost but in our merry capital city the situation is very similar to what you describe: tents everywhere, camps along the Rock Creek, few steps from the Kennedy Center, under the K Street bridge, and everywhere...

Still, this is a parallel universe... sad - but their misery does not impact our daily lives. I am sure there are plenty of infectious diseases already but they are contained by the social isolation which is a big part of homelessness.

[timelets]

Maybe it's my imagination, but I can see a huge backlash against homeless after a couple of confirmed coronavirus deaths in one of those camps. It might get really ugly.

[lm644]

It will depend on how the media spin it. Naming the victims is not customary, providing their home addresses or any personal info - even less so. I don’t think people will get blamed for getting sick; nor should they. At the same time, public health officials will have to quarantine everybody in contact with the infected people, so the responsibility will be really on them, not on the homeless population. Here we finish the full circle and come back to the fact that municipalities do not have adequate facilities to quarantine a large number of people. They don’t have the authority to preventively arrest and jail people who did not commit any crime either. This is America, after all, not the late USSR.