All ignorance is
either ignorance
of things or
of the
limits of knowledge.
If my
ignorance is
accidental and not
necessary,
it must incite me,
in the first case,
to a dogmatical inquiry
regarding
the objects
of which
I am ignorant;
in the second,
to a critical
investigation into
the bounds of all
possible knowledge.
But that my
ignorance is
absolutely necessary and
unavoidable, and
that it consequently
absolves from the duty of
all further
investigation,
is a fact which
cannot be made out
upon empirical grounds —
from observation —
but upon critical grounds
alone, that is,
by a thoroughgoing investigation
into the primary sources of
cognition.
It follows that
the determination
of the bounds of reason
can be made only
on a priori grounds;
while the empirical limitation of
reason,
which is merely
an indeterminate cognition
of an ignorance that can never
be completely
removed,
can take place only
a posteriori.
Immanuel Kant. “The Critique of Pure Reason.”