timelets: (Default)
Читаю уже второй том биографии Сталина, написанной проф. Коткиным. Заодно, посмотрел его "дуэт" с Славоем Жижеком.

Запишу несколько впечатлений:
1. Из двух книг Коткина я узнал об истории России/СССР больше, чем за годы учебы в советской школe.
2. Сталин построил диктатуру в диктатуре, т.е. диктаторский режим внутри партии, которая была инструментом диктатуры в СССР.
3. В окружении Сталина не было людей, которые бы устроили коллективизацию ценой смерти миллионов крестьян и голода среди десятков миллионов.
4. Личность диктатора играет огромную роль, и его убийство может быть вариантом ее серьезного смягчения, т.е. спасением миллионов жизней.

Here, Zizek gives his recommendations on best fictional depictions of the Soviet System (Shalamov & Platonov). Funny, how he calls Akhmatova "an endlessly pretentious bitch."



upd. at the 1:26:27 mark Zizek makes a deep point that is quite relevant in today's America. First, he notes that modern communists/authoritarians, e.g. in China and Vietnam, are much more efficient capitalist managers than democracies. Then, he adds, "the problem is that for me global capitalism is approaching a stage where it less and less needs democracy."
Few years ago, Peter Thiel remarked that freedom wss incompatible with democracy; for him freedom meant its libertarian version for billionaires. He felt that democratic institutions were constraining his freedom and he set out to destroy them, using Vance, Trump, Musk, etc.
timelets: (Default)

Though Trump has been in office for more than three weeks, he has yet to send a substantive bill to Congress. Some observers have compared Trump’s flurry of action to Franklin Roosevelt’s first 100 days, or Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society agenda. They are missing the point. FDR and LBJ sent big legislation to Congress. Trump is starting with a pipeline of executive orders. If the courts stymie those, they will be blocking his agenda. His strategy rests on a pliant judiciary.

He believes the US electorate gave him an unchecked mandate. It follows that any interference in his exercise of power — including an Alice-style belief that the US constitution means what he chooses it to mean — amounts to a block on democracy. Could he put 30,000 illegal immigrants beyond legal reach in a refitted Guantánamo Bay? Of course. The American people have spoken. Might he pick which of America’s creditors to repay and which to declare fraudulent? Quite possibly. Trump, not judges, will be the decider.

The Republican-controlled Congress has removed itself from Trump’s path. Unelected judges are the problem. Ultimate among those are the nine justices of the US Supreme Court. It is to their inboxes such dilemmas are heading. At stake is their reason for existing.

Turkeys are allegedly opposed to Thanksgiving. Yet the Supreme Court last July granted the US president sweeping immunity from almost any “official” acts. It takes little imagination to infer that this could be stretched to ignoring the courts. The six justices who put their names to that ruling may now regret their loose phrasing. They could have edited themselves into an advisory body. The problem the court faces is that Trump has a strong wind at his back. Constitutional lawyers warn that he could destroy America’s separation of powers.

https://www.ft.com/content/8e52b5ae-56b4-4571-ba09-103d5799ce9a
timelets: (Default)
Just a thought while browsing news from Russia: historically, emigrating from Russia/USSR has always been the right decision, esp. long-term.
timelets: (Default)


https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/trcdohan8j/20200828_yahoo_coronavirus_crosstabs.pdf

The only reason Trump has a chance is the demographic shift toward the aging population.

timelets: (Default)
В интервью Лоре Инграм на Фоксе лживое хуйло откровенно врет, что Южная Корея дала Америке дополнительные $500М за содержание американских войск. Но проблема даже не в этом (лживое хуйло врет, потому что дышит), а в том, что ведущая журналистка самой популярной сети новостей в стране и не думает сказать президенту, что он несет полную хуйню на весь мир.

Понятно, как такое может происходить при авторитарном режиме где-нибудь в Китае, России или Нигерии. Непонятно, почему такое происходит в Америке в условиях демократии и свободы прессы.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEeDJsmvKxs&feature=youtu.be
timelets: (Default)
A woman would get married when she was between 12 and 18. A man would be at least 30. Marriages were arranged; dowries were required; women had no choice of their husband.

Prostitutes were mostly recruited from abroad.
timelets: (Default)
An interesting article about how Russian authorities squeeze out independent media.

https://meduza.io/feature/2015/11/17/lannister-s-dolgami

В сентябре 2014 года в Госдуму был внесен законопроект, который предлагал ограничить 20% доли иностранного капитала в любых СМИ, включая печатную прессу и интернет-издания. Медиарынок воспринял это предложение как неудачную шутку; однако законопроект был принят стремительно и единодушно. Уже принятый и подписанный президентом документ называли законом имени «Ведомостей» и Forbes — он как будто только ради них и был написан (ЗАО «Бизнес Ньюс Медиа», в которое входит «Ведомости», в тот момент принадлежало финской Sanoma, американским Dow Jones & Co и FT Group; издательский дом «Аксель Шпрингер Раша», в который входит Forbes, — немецкому Axel Springer SE).


Based on the latest events (the terrorist attacks in Paris and the G20 meeting), it appears that Russia is "too big to fail." The smaller countries in the region should beware.

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 11:12 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios