(no subject)
Feb. 3rd, 2019 01:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Formal distinction is definitely a real distinction, expressing as it does the different layers of reality that form or constitute a being. Thus it is called formalis a parte rei or actualis ex natura rei. But it is a minimally real distinction because the two really distinct quiddities are coordinate, together making a single being. Real andy et not numerical, such is the status of forĀmal distinction.
G Deleuze. Expressionism...: Spinoza.
We may (have to?) use different formal methods to explore different layers of reality.
upd: it's an old argument between Duns Scotus and Ockham.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_distinction