(no subject)
Sep. 7th, 2013 12:06 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
timeletsЕсли Путин не знает (или не хочет знать) реальное положение дел в процессах Навального ("лес, спирт, заграничнеые фирмы"), то знать о фактах применении хим оружия он и подавно не может.
Also, it would be interesting to consider Putin's consistent refusal to refer to Mr. Navalnly by name from a theory of speech act perspective. So far, I've heard two or three hypotheses, including the "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" one. None of them makes much sense to me. I have a feeling that it's either a de-individualizing assertion or a derivative from an illegal directive, which requires plausible deniability.
Also, it would be interesting to consider Putin's consistent refusal to refer to Mr. Navalnly by name from a theory of speech act perspective. So far, I've heard two or three hypotheses, including the "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" one. None of them makes much sense to me. I have a feeling that it's either a de-individualizing assertion or a derivative from an illegal directive, which requires plausible deniability.
