![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Yeah, teach 'em how to win, Trumpy!
Trump and his supporters are missing a great chance to make a lot of money. All they need to do is place a massive bet on Trump in the presidential race and get him elected despite the odds.
Oct. 11th, 2016
Yeah, teach 'em how to win, Trumpy!
Trump and his supporters are missing a great chance to make a lot of money. All they need to do is place a massive bet on Trump in the presidential race and get him elected despite the odds.
Identity function - the automobile
Oct. 11th, 2016 11:00 amA different type of engine — electric instead of internal combustion — doesn't change the car. On the other hand, making it autonomous creates a different type of vehicle.
Unfortunately, I don't know how to capture this difference in terms of category theory. Maybe it should be done through introducing a new function that reflects interaction with the environment. That is, the old car doesn't addapt to the environment, while the new one does.
Maybe I can do it through a product, e.g.
A - automobile
E - environment
f: A x E -> A
Unfortunately, I don't know how to capture this difference in terms of category theory. Maybe it should be done through introducing a new function that reflects interaction with the environment. That is, the old car doesn't addapt to the environment, while the new one does.
Maybe I can do it through a product, e.g.
A - automobile
E - environment
f: A x E -> A
Just a follow-up on the earlier post:
As we can see, the autonomous car represents an innovation that is larger than the electric car because it instantiates a higher-level object type.
upd: the "non-human" predicate is incorrect because it's assumes that the law of excluded middle applies. I need to find a more neutral term.
As we can see, the autonomous car represents an innovation that is larger than the electric car because it instantiates a higher-level object type.
upd: the "non-human" predicate is incorrect because it's assumes that the law of excluded middle applies. I need to find a more neutral term.