timelets: (Default)
[personal profile] timelets
...warfare between the Greek city-states was endemic. Yet from early on in its history Rome’s war-making was distinctive in character, not simply because it was so successful, but through its talent for consolidating success on a permanent basis, as defeated enemies were absorbed and turned into reliable allies.
...
Comparatively early on, both Roman and Latin status had lost any real association with particular ethnic or even linguistic groups, and had become primarily legal distinctions. Over time, communities not granted such privileges could hope to gain them, progressing by stages from Latin rights to citizenship without the vote, and finally to full Roman citizenship.
...
The most common obligation of all types of ally, including the Latins, was to supply Rome with men and resources in time of war. At least half of any Roman army invariably consisted of allied soldiers. In this way the defeated enemies of the past helped to win the wars of the present. Apart from confirming their loyalty to Rome in this way, the allied communities were also allowed a small, but significant, share in the profits of warfare.

--- Adrian Goldsworthy, Caesar: Life of a Colossus.

Date: 2020-02-23 05:56 am (UTC)
juan_gandhi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] juan_gandhi
The Greeks did pretty much similar tricks. And I don't know about the other guys, Phonecians?

Date: 2020-02-23 06:48 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The Greeks did build asymmetrical alliances with defeated cities but citizenship was limited to one's original city, not to the master city or the alliance as a whole.

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3456
78910111213
14 151617 18 19 20
21 222324252627
2829 30 31   

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 07:25 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios