Date: 2019-10-31 11:50 pm (UTC)
peristaltor: (Default)
From: [personal profile] peristaltor
I also consider influential the money dumped into US political publishing starting in the 1970s, that led to key erosion of progressive agenda points; the erosion of journalism started in that same period, which led to the shedding of a vast percentage of journalists.

That last effort to reduce actual shoe leather gathering stories forced the existing workforce to concentrate on inconsequential story angles such as the destructive and divisive horse race coverage.

Also, there is substantial evidence that this lay off effort, which started with the more progressive journalists fired first, began well before the 2008 bust. It was well underway in the early '90s. I theorize that Watergate, the Church Committee, and other purges in wealthy political intersections, motivated the wealthy (which, of course, own the newspapers) to reduce reporter ranks in order to do what they want without as much fear of detection. For evidence of its long-term effectiveness, witness the Duke Cunningham prosecution, which was only the tip of the crapburg. The prosecutions stopped after W. fired the attorneys general just as the same investigation that got Cunningham was ramping up.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
678 9 10 1112
13 1415 16171819
20212223242526
2728 293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 03:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios