![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Dec. 27th, 2016 12:19 pmProbably it's not new, but the idea that the reality (whatever it means) can be described completely in words, music, formulas, protein codes, etc. implies that the reality is a free monoid "implemented by nature" and we have a functor that maps the reality to words, music, formulas, etc.
On the other hand, a subset of the reality can be described in such terms. For example, human breathing is a regular process that lasts between one's birth and death. For all intents and purposes, we can not only describe, but also synchronize it with texts and music, i.e. sing songs.
Most economists consider the reality to be even simpler than that because in their models it evenutally maps to R (benefits - costs) and linear time T.
On the other hand, a subset of the reality can be described in such terms. For example, human breathing is a regular process that lasts between one's birth and death. For all intents and purposes, we can not only describe, but also synchronize it with texts and music, i.e. sing songs.
Most economists consider the reality to be even simpler than that because in their models it evenutally maps to R (benefits - costs) and linear time T.
