Quote of the Day: old Indian tales

Betaal stops and asks King Vikram this question: Who among the three suitors should be the husband of Mandaravati? Vikram replies with a lot of thought, "The person who gave her the life by reciting the spell is her creator, it could be her father. The person who took her bones to Ganges shall be her son. But the person who committed himself to the ground and slept on her ashes out of love, can be her husband."

--- Vikram and Betaal Stries.

Identity function - the head

On seeing the state of his brother-in-law, the husband was also moved deeply and he decided to offer his own head too to the goddess and cut his own head with his scitmar.

Madanasundari, after a long wait came and saw both her brother and husband lying on the ground and then decided to take her own life but asked the goddesss to get the same brother and husband in the next life. The goddess was pleased and stopped her from dying and asked her to join their heads and bodies and then she granted them life. In a hurry, Madanasundari, confused the heads of her brother and husband and was perplexed.

Betaal stops and asks King Vikram this question: Who among the two is the husband of Madanasundari? Vikram replies with a lot of thought, "The body that carries her husband's head is is her husband. The head is the most important part of the human body, and the rest of the body is identified by the head."

f: A -> B  // removing the head;
g: B ->A // attaching the head;

gf = 1_A

(no subject)

I'd be really surprised if Romney joins the Trump administration now. Why would he do that? Most likely, the cabinet will be made up of screwballs like Sessions and Trump himself. Let them make Alabama and Kansas great again, whatever that means.

(no subject)

Если избирательный возраст ограничивают снизу - 18 лет, то надо бы его ограничивать сверху тоже. Например, запретить голосовать людям старше 75. Иначе геронтократия получается, а не государство.

(no subject)

Когда мы поставим к конвейеру американского рабочего в Америке, китайского в Китае, или мексиканского в Мексике, то единственная разница будет в том, что время американского рабочего обойдется дороже, чем китайского или мексиканского. Если очистить риторику Трампа от шелухи, то получится, что единственный способ поддержать на плаву американских работяг - это субсидировать их за счет американских предпринимателей, инженеров, финансистов и фермеров. Технологическая революция превратила рабочий класс в паразита общества.