First, I really appreciate your comments and questions. They really help me focus on both consistency and usefulness of the model. Frankly. putting together a category is still a bit of challenge; mapping it to a real life situation is even a greater challenge. In short, you are asking all the right questions and I should've been asking them myself more often. And, overall, I agree with your point that most of it can be done in sets. For now.
Second, with regard to usefulness, just this summer we applied/tested this approach, albeit informally, to help several startups to evaluate and rework their business models. You'll be surprised how many questions and insights these little formulas te=1A and ur =IR generate in a conversation between technologists and investors. Of course it's a small sample, but I'm encouraged with the early results.
Third, I have a feeling that composition of arrows can be translated into real life using the concept of Point of View. For example, the process has to commute from points of view of J, A, H and R. Still working on it, though.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2019-09-23 04:48 am (UTC)Second, with regard to usefulness, just this summer we applied/tested this approach, albeit informally, to help several startups to evaluate and rework their business models. You'll be surprised how many questions and insights these little formulas te=1A and ur =IR generate in a conversation between technologists and investors. Of course it's a small sample, but I'm encouraged with the early results.
Third, I have a feeling that composition of arrows can be translated into real life using the concept of Point of View. For example, the process has to commute from points of view of J, A, H and R. Still working on it, though.