![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
timelets* Хотел написать этот пост по-русски, но в русской википедии нет статьи про EFQ. Ближайший эквивалент, который я знаю это фраза из Достоевского: "Если Бога нет, то все позволено."
The old principle of Ex Falso Sequitur Quodlibet (from falsehood, anything) forces an explosion of truths to be discovered and may tax the collective brain quite heavily with efforts to discover them. For Descartes, Hume, and Kant, the collapse of Aristotle's truths meant an opportunity to develop a new philosophical system, based on Cogito. For Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault the falsity of the word of Modern Reason [originated by Descartes] created a chance to focus on "sum", i.e. the new humanism based on one's "throwness-into-the-world."
EFQ can also be used by con artists to confuse, rather than create. And that's how you know whether the person who is saying "все неоднозначно" is genuine or not: what's the direction of his/her post–⊥ creative effort?
The old principle of Ex Falso Sequitur Quodlibet (from falsehood, anything) forces an explosion of truths to be discovered and may tax the collective brain quite heavily with efforts to discover them. For Descartes, Hume, and Kant, the collapse of Aristotle's truths meant an opportunity to develop a new philosophical system, based on Cogito. For Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Foucault the falsity of the word of Modern Reason [originated by Descartes] created a chance to focus on "sum", i.e. the new humanism based on one's "throwness-into-the-world."
EFQ can also be used by con artists to confuse, rather than create. And that's how you know whether the person who is saying "все неоднозначно" is genuine or not: what's the direction of his/her post–⊥ creative effort?
no subject
Date: 2019-05-18 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-05-18 10:53 pm (UTC)