timelets: (Default)
timelets ([personal profile] timelets) wrote2020-09-16 05:00 pm
Entry tags:

Fucking Moron (tm)

Mr. Trump said Dr. Redfield misunderstood the question, “but we are beyond that now.” The president added that “there are some people who don’t like the mask.”

At the Senate hearing, Dr. Redfield held up a mask and said it “is more guaranteed to protect me against Covid than when I take a Covid vaccine, because the immunogenicity may be 70%. And if I don’t get an immune response, the vaccine is not going to protect me. This face mask will.” He repeated that message in his tweet.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/coronavirus-latest-news-09-16-2020-11600244664

It's really unfortunate that we have a self-serving ignoramus playing the role of the US president during the time of an epidemic. Any CEO of a public company would be fired for this type of behavior.
tijd: (Default)

[personal profile] tijd 2020-09-17 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
Сентябрь 2016. Ответ на вопрос Scientific American “How would you improve federal research and our public health system to better protect Americans from emerging diseases and other public health threats, such as antibiotic resistant superbugs?”

Donald Trump (R): “The implication of the question is that one must provide more resources to research and public health enterprises to make sure we stay ahead of potential health risks. In a time of limited resources, one must ensure that the nation is getting the greatest bang for the buck. We cannot simply throw money at these institutions and assume that the nation will be well served. What we ought to focus on is assessing where we need to be as a nation and then applying resources to those areas where we need the most work. Our efforts to support research and public health initiatives will have to be balanced with other demands for scarce resources. Working with Congress—the people’s representatives—my administration will work to establish national priorities and then we will work to make sure that adequate resources are assigned to achieve our goals.“
https://tijd.dreamwidth.org/72447.html

Сентябрь 2020:

“Scientific American has never endorsed a presidential candidate in its 175-year history. This year we are compelled to do so. We do not do this lightly.
The evidence and the science show that Donald Trump has badly damaged the U.S. and its people—because he rejects evidence and science. The most devastating example is his dishonest and inept response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which cost more than 190,000 Americans their lives by the middle of September. He has also attacked environmental protections, medical care, and the researchers and public science agencies that help this country prepare for its greatest challenges. That is why we urge you to vote for Joe Biden, who is offering fact-based plans to protect our health, our economy and the environment. These and other proposals he has put forth can set the country back on course for a safer, more prosperous and more equitable future.“
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientific-american-endorses-joe-biden/