<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-25:2614584</id>
  <title>timelets</title>
  <subtitle>timelets</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>timelets</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2023-07-24T03:13:15Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="timelets" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-25:2614584:1534865</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/1534865.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=1534865"/>
    <title>timelets @ 2023-07-23T20:09:00</title>
    <published>2023-07-24T03:13:15Z</published>
    <updated>2023-07-24T03:13:15Z</updated>
    <category term="knowledge"/>
    <category term="complexity"/>
    <category term="psychology"/>
    <category term="quote"/>
    <category term="intuition"/>
    <category term="society"/>
    <category term="technology"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We argue here that people’s limited knowledge and their misleading intuitive epistemology combine to create an illusion of explanatory depth (IOED). Most people feel they understand the world with far greater detail, coherence, and depth than they really do. The illusion for ex- planatory knowledge–knowledge that involves complex causal patterns—is separate from, and additive with, people’s general overconfidence about their knowledge and skills. We therefore propose that knowledge of complex causal relations is particularly susceptible to illusions of understanding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-18942-001"&gt;https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-18942-001&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Is the growth of conspiracy theories an inevitable consequence of the growing complexity of technology/society?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=timelets&amp;ditemid=1534865" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2016-12-25:2614584:734495</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/734495.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://timelets.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=734495"/>
    <title>TIL: Cut to the chase</title>
    <published>2017-12-11T19:15:06Z</published>
    <updated>2017-12-11T19:15:06Z</updated>
    <category term="til"/>
    <category term="complexity"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>0</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">&lt;a href="https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/cut-to-the-chase.html"&gt;https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/cut-to-the-chase.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;That figurative use, that is, the generalized 'get to the point' meaning emerged in the 1940s. The Winnipeg Free Press, March 1944 ran an article about screen writing that included this:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Miss [Helen] Deutsch has another motto, which had to do with the writing of cinematic drama. It also is on the wall where she cant miss seeing it, and it says: "When in doubt, cut to the chase."&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=timelets&amp;ditemid=734495" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
